Your basic guide to strategic choices in Google Ads

Alan working at his desk in the Excite Media office
Time to read: 5 minutes

Open a Google Ads account, and you’re handed loads of decisions before you’ve even launched a campaign. Campaign type, bidding strategy, budget split, match types, structure, conversion actions, the list keeps going.

Now, when you’re DIYing your Google Ads, you generally don’t actually choose most of these. You accept the default, pick whatever Google recommends in the setup flow, and move on. Which is fine, until performance stalls but you can’t quite say why, because you didn’t make any decisions in the first place.

None of these settings is neutral. Each one is a strategic choice, and each one shapes what your campaigns are capable of. Let’s get into it.

Rebecca participating in a team discussion at the Excite Media office

Choosing the right campaign type

Search, Performance Max, Display, Shopping, Video. Each one exists to do a different job, and the first strategic choice you make is deciding which job you actually need done.

Search captures existing intent. People are already looking for what you sell. Display and Video build awareness with people who aren’t looking yet. Shopping puts your products in front of people mid-comparison. Performance Max does a bit of everything, automatically, across all of Google’s inventory at once.

That last one is exactly why it’s so tempting. It’s the easiest box to tick, and it usually performs fine. But “fine” is doing a lot of work in that sentence, because Performance Max also hands a lot of control back to Google, and you lose visibility into what’s actually driving the result.

You need to be thinking about what you’re actually trying to achieve and go from there. If the answer to that is “a hands-off, convenient, all-in-one campaign” and you’re willing to pay extra for that convenience, then by all means, use Performance Max.

Picking a bidding strategy

Manual CPC, Maximise Clicks, Maximise Conversions, Target CPA, Target ROAS. This is where most accounts either quietly thrive or quietly bleed budget, and the difference usually comes down to one thing: whether the strategy matches the data you’ve actually got. Automated bidding strategies need conversion volume to learn from. Not “some” a genuinely meaningful amount, consistently. Without it, Target CPA or Target ROAS is just guessing with extra steps, and it’ll often guess badly while it’s “learning”. Manual bidding trades that automation away for control. You decide; Google doesn’t infer. It’s more work, for sure, but it’s also more predictable when the data isn’t there yet to support automation. The mistake we see constantly is switching bidding strategies too early, or too often, chasing a bad week instead of giving a strategy enough runway to actually learn. Every switch resets the learning period, and every reset costs you performance you’ll never get back.
Shane chatting with a colleague at the Excite Media office

Allocating budget deliberately

Budget isn’t just a cap on spend. It’s a statement about what you believe deserves attention. And most accounts don’t treat it that way. They split it evenly across campaigns, or leave it wherever it landed during setup and never revisit it.

A more strategic approach treats budget as two separate pots: money spent testing what might work, and money spent scaling what’s already proven. Mixing the two means your best campaigns are starved while you’re still funding an experiment that hasn’t earned it yet.

It’s also worth asking where in the funnel your budget is actually going. All-in on bottom-funnel Search? You’ll convert existing demand efficiently, right up until you run out of it. When nothing feeds awareness, nothing new enters the pipeline behind it.

Targeting: who you reach, and how tightly

Keyword match types are the clearest example of this trade-off. Broad match reaches more people, with less precision. Exact match reaches fewer people, with far more control over who. Phrase sits in the middle. None of them is “correct,” they’re just different bets on reach versus relevance.

Layer audience signals, geography, and device targeting on top, and you’ve got a really quite long list of dials, each one trading breadth for precision in its own way.

The strategic call here depends entirely on the goal. A campaign built to find new customers needs room to reach people you haven’t defined yet, so tighter isn’t always better. A campaign built to convert warm, high-intent traffic efficiently usually wants the opposite.

Jana and Jason smiling together in a modern office workspace

Structuring the account

Single sprawling campaigns versus tightly segmented ones. This decision shapes the relevance of your campaign and how much you can actually learn from your own reporting.

Segment too little, and you can’t tell what’s working inside a campaign: everything blends into one average. Segment too much, and you starve every individual campaign of the data volume it needs to optimise and potentially budget — depending on how much spend you’re working with.

The strategic question is whether you’re structuring for ease of management or for clarity of insight, because those two goals can pull in pretty different directions.

Measurement: deciding what actually counts as success

This might be the most strategic choice of all, and it’s the one that gets the least attention. Whatever conversion action you tell Google to optimise toward is exactly what the algorithm will chase, relentlessly, without asking whether it’s actually the thing your business cares about.

Counting a newsletter signup the same as a completed sale, or a form submission the same as a qualified lead, means your entire campaign is optimising toward a number that doesn’t reflect revenue. Automated bidding will happily deliver you a pile of cheap, low-value conversions, because that’s what you asked for.

Picking the right primary conversion, and being honest about what’s secondary, is what determines whether the rest of these strategic choices actually add up to anything.

Excite Media team members discussing a digital marketing project

What does all of this mean for your strategy?

None of these choices sits in isolation. They’re all tangled up together. Pick Performance Max and you’ve basically picked automated bidding along with it, since manual bidding isn’t really an option there. Pick manual bidding, and you’ve just signed up for a lot more hands-on budget management than Target ROAS would’ve asked of you. Pull one lever without thinking about what it does to the others, and you end up optimising one part of the account while quietly wrecking another

Strategy in Google Ads isn’t about finding the right setting — the right setting doesn’t exist. It’s about making these choices on purpose and revisiting them as your goals change, instead of running whatever the setup flow suggested a year ago. 

Need a hand making sense of your Google Ads account? We’d love to help 👋

AUTHOR

Laura English

Head of Digital Marketing Delivery

Laura English is the Head of Digital Marketing Delivery at Excite Media. She has worked in the SEO and communications industries since 2015 across copywriting, content marketing, SEO, public relations, and journalism. She holds a Bachelor of Journalism, minoring in Creative Writing. Laura is a big fan of the written word and loves combining creative writing with the persuasive.

chat icon

Ready to chat with us?

google icon
5 stars

200+ 5-star reviews